This page contains explanatory notes and background information on various entries on the Books and Maps pages.
Click on any Books or Maps button to view the related entry on that page.
This page contains explanatory notes and background information on various entries on the Books and Maps pages.
Click on any Books or Maps button to view the related entry on that page.
The author was not above bending—and sometimes breaking—the truth to suit his purposes. On pp. 208-09 he has the following to say about Dr. Frederick Cook:
During the “Belgica” expedition, Cook stayed comfortably at Harburton [sic, Harberton] while the rest of the ship's company went south, picking him up on their return.
In fact, Cook went to Antarctica with the Belgica and was credited by Roald Amundsen and other crew members with saving their lives when the ship became trapped in the ice. He did indeed visit Harberton before and after Antarctica, but certainly did not stay there while the others went south. As a close friend of the Bridges family, Barclay presumably knew very well the actual facts of the matter. Cook's former friend and later rival the explorer Robert E. Peary, the New York Times and others launched a smear campaign against Cook, and it's tempting to surmise that Barclay lied about the facts as part of that campaign.
The author's Terceira Década da Ásia, dos feitos que os portugueses fizeram no descobrimento dos mares e terras do Oriente was the third of his four volumes, to which Diogo de Couto subsequently added nine more. When the set was reprinted (1778-1788), the title was revised to Da Ásia de João de Barros … Decada Terceira, Parte Primeira. This volume is included here because it contains Magellan's “Order of the Day.” An English translation is in Stanley: The First Voyage … .
Byron—dubbed “Foul-Weather Jack” because his voyages were so often marked by awful weather—was the grandfather of Lord George Anson Byron, the poet.
According to Wikipedia, Correa lived ca. 1496-1563, and was in India from about 1512 until 1529. His eight-part Lendas da India (“Legends of India”), containing accounts of various Portuguese explorers, was first published some three centuries after his death, probably from his ca. 1550-1562 manuscript. See Stanley below for the English translation.
Publication date and partial list of explorers for each part are given in the list below.
How Correa came to know of the Magellan voyage, which he includes in Tomo II, Parte II, is unknown. He had known Magellan in India before the expedition, and after returning to Portugal in 1529 may have spoken to surviving crew members. However, this part of his work is thought to have been written in about 1562, some forty years after the survivors reached Lisbon. The accounts may therefore have passed through several persons before reaching him, which may account from some of his errors, as noted by footnotes in the text.
The author was Fiddler & Boy to Poop Cabin when the Beagle began its voyage, became Darwin's servant in May, 1833, and remained in his service after the voyage. In his Journal, “Appendix A” is a list of Beagle crew members. However, the list is not the work of Covington himself, but was added later on, perhaps by someone at the University of Melbourne.
As noted on the Place Names page, the 1769 Cruz Cano y Olmedilla map is based on various relations, especialmente de las de Sarmiento, which explains the appearance on the chart of “C. de la Virgen Maria,” instead of Magellan's original “Cape of the 11,000 Virgins” as reported by Antonio Pigafetta. Later on, other cartographers used the chart as a source for their own work, but changed the cape name as in these two examples:
Both examples restore Magellan's “Virgins” (note plural) but omit the number. Perhaps to be on the safe side, Schraembl adds a parenthetical reference to the Virgin Mary. He also mis-spells “Olmedilla.”
All three charts are sequentially displayed via the link from each chart name, and the cartographer's name appears briefly at top center. The charts are followed by detail views of the cape area plus NASA satellite image for comparison, and then by the actual chart titles.
The author's “The Chart of Magellan” is a description of a ca. 1522 untitled chart of the Southern Hemisphere by Pedro Reinel, believed to be a copy of his earlier chart which Magellan may have taken on his voyage.
In an Imago Mundi reprint presented to naval historian Samuel Eliot Morison, Destombes has corrected the chart legend with two hand-written insertions, shown here in italics:
Chart of the Antarctic Attributed to Pedro Reinel and containing original record of the voyage of Magellan in the Atlantic. M. D.
Although the “… by Sir Francis Drake” on the title page may suggest that this is the name of the author, it is actually part of the title. Drakes's nephew, also named Francis, signed the book's brief dedication to Robert, Earl of Warwick, and may or may not have edited the text, which is mostly taken from the journal of the ship's chaplain, Francis Fletcher.
In 1831, The Royal Geographical Society published J. Gardner's engraved Chart, inserted between pages 156 & 156 in Phillip Parker King's “Some Observations …” paper. In 1839, the chart was inserted between pages 462 & 463 in Volume 1 of FitzRoy et al; Narrative of the Surveying Voyages … .
In both charts, San Sebastián bay is placed some 25 miles south of its actual location, and its inner shore deleted. The simple compass rose on the 1831 chart is omitted on the 1839 chart. The legends at the bottom of each chart are:
Published for the Journal of the Royal Geographical Society by John Murray, Albemarle Street, London, September 1831.|
Lower Left: Printed by J. Shury; Lower Right: Engraved by J. Gardner
Published by Henry Colburn, Great Marlborough Street, 1839.|
Lower Left: blank; Lower Right: Engraved by J. Gardner
Regarding the misplaced position noted above, one possible clue is a notation seen just to the right of the bay: “No opening was seen here by Capt. Fitzroy …” The notation first appears on the 1831 chart, thus suggesting that FitzRoy's observation was made on the first Beagle survey. If so, the chart may show an opening based on its presumed location, and the note points out that FitzRoy did not find it there.
On another Gardner chart—The Strait of Magalhaens—included in the 1839 edition only, Sebastián Bay is correctly placed and the notation is lacking, thus suggesting that FitzRoy did find the opening on the second Beagle voyage; the 1831 chart was not corrected, but the newer chart was created based on his later survey. In fact, his Table of Latitudes … gives accurate coordinates for locations on either side of the bay:
The Cambridge University Library holds Charles Darwin's hand-colored copy of the chart, on which the presence of the simple compass rose and the Royal Geographical Society notation indicate his copy was from King's 1831 paper. Of particular interest is the San Sebastián area. A detail view shows that someone—perhaps Darwin himself—had “corrected” the chart, bringing it into agreement with Gardner's The Strait of Magalhaens chart mentioned above.
As far as is known, Darwin offers no explanation for the coloring he added to the chart. However, a “p. 94” notation on the back of the chart may be a clue that he wanted it inserted after that page—the final page of his Chapter IV—in the first edition of his Journal of Researches, perhaps when it was published separately from the FitzRoy et al multi-volume Narrative. If so, his wish was not realized, for reasons unknown.
The work is included here because it includes “The Famous Voyage of Sir Francis Drake into the South Sea …” which in turn includes a description of Drake's arrival at San Julián, and attributes that name to Magellan. The “Famous Voyage” is printed on six unpaginated leaves, inserted between pages 643 and 644 of the book. See The Origin of San Julián for more details.
Byron's “Journal” was heavily edited by Sir John Hawkesworth when he compiled several voyage accounts in his An Account of the Voyages … in 1773.
Henslow's “Description…” is included here because one of his illustrations is the source for the opuntia sketch in the 1890 illustrated edition of Darwin's Journal of Researches.
For reasons unknown, translator Michael Kerney is identified on the title page only by his initials.
Philip Gidley King, the father of HMS Adventure's captain, Phillip Parker King, named his son in honor of the first governor of New South Wales, Arthur Phillip. The captain subsequently named his own son Philip, in honor of the captain's father. Hence the different spellings of the first name of the three generations.
Architect Richard Morris Hunt gave the globe to James Lenox, and it subsequently became part of the New York Public Library's collection of maps and globes. In Benjamin Franklin de Costa's “The Lenox Globe” article, a fold-out map shows the surface of the globe, which is considerably easier to study than the globe itself, which the author dates to ca. 1510-11. The drawing makes it clear that a large body of water below South America (shown in grey here) was known to exist more than a decade before the voyage of Magellan.
In his introduction to the Hakluyt Society's Early Voyages …, editor Clements Markham notes (pp. 14-15) that after the return of Magellan's Victoria, the uncertainty about the fate of the Trinidad and the crewmen left at Tidore, “It was finally resolved to send another expedition to the Spice Islands, by way of the new strait.”
The account of this expedition contains 53 numbered “Instructions to the Comendador Loaysa” (pp. 31-38), two of which are reproduced here:
VI. The Captain General is not to adopt a course, or to take a new direction without first calling a Council meeting consisting of all the captains, pilots and masters of the fleet.
XIV. If unable to double the Cape of Good Hope (Que no pudiendo doblar el cabo de Buena Esperança … in original), or, having doubled it, the bad weather prevents a continuance of the voyage, so as to make it advisable to find a port for winter, a Council shall be summoned to select the safest harbour.
In the original Spanish (Herrera, Década Tercera, p. 275), the instructions are un-numbered and contained within a single paragraph. And in context, it would appear that the fleet was expected to sail eastward to Maluca, not westward through the Strait of Magellan as stated in Markham's introduction. The Spanish excerpt in parentheses shows that “Cape of Good Hope” was not an error introduced in translation. However, the accounts of de Urdaneta and de Uriarte make it clear that the fleet sailed westward through the Strait of Magellan, and that there was no Council meeting to discuss a change of direction. Markham offers no explanation for this apparent change of plans.
In his “Author's Foreword,” Mitchell comments on his subject's last name:
Over the correct form of Elcano's name, “de Elcano,” or “del cano” (sometimes “delcano”), controversy has been long and even impassioned. Those writers who adopt the latter form do so on the grounds that it is the one used by Juan Sebastian in signing both his will and his letter to the Emperor. [But] In 1873 the Geographical Society of Madrid stated that this form [“Elcano”] was the correct one.
Keeping in mind the above sample of Juan Sebastián's signature, and that Navarette also refers to him as “Del Cano,” this form of his name is followed here.
For reasons unknown, Sir John's last name was—and still is—frequently spelled “Narborough” despite the fact that he signed himself “Narbrough” (see sample below). To add to the confusion, the title page of An Account of Several Late Voyages & Discoveries … also lists him as “Narborough” even though he is “Narbrough” in his Journal included in that volume.
The three known versions of his map are summarized here:
Each cartouche shows his name as “Narbrough.”
Perhaps the next “Narborough” appearance (1699) was in “Cowley's Voyage Round the Globe” in William Hacke's Collection of Original Voyages:
(p. 10) And before the said Bay lieth another Island, the which I call'd Sir John Narborough's.
However, Herman Moll's map in the same book (facing p. 9) shows this island as “Narbrough Isl.”
The port of San Julián is correctly placed on the three maps cited above, but the text legend is correctly placed next to the actual port on version 1 only. This agrees with Narbrough's own reference to “The Mouth of Port Saint Julian, in Latitude 49 d. 10 m. South.” On versions 2 & 3, the text legend is displaced about 70 miles south of its actual location (at approximately 50° 20' S).
A note at the Huntington Digital Library site states that version 1 was dated ca. 1690 by (London book dealer Leon) Kashnor, but does not identify the source. Thought to be Kashnor's Americana: Rare and Valuable Books, Early Maps, Fine Engravings and Original Drawings.
The de Nodal brothers were the first to report the existence of the San Sebastián Channel, connecting the modern Bahías Inutil and San Sebastián. The first edition is dated 1721, and the second is undated. Although the Hakluyt edition inserts the year 1766 on the translated title page, “Año đ 1769” is in the lower right-hand corner of the map inserted between pages 72 & 73 of the latter edition, and that date is used here as the publication date. Map engravers are:
1721: I (Jean) de Courbes
1769: Manuel de Rueda
Note: “Viaje” in 1721, “Viage” in 1769 titles.
The four known versions of Pigafetta's manuscript are summarized below, followed by a listing of a few printed editions.
|24224 §||Paris: Bibliothèque Impérial||French|
|New Haven, CT: Beinecke Library, Yale University|
|L. 103 Sup.||Milan: Ambrosian Library (popularly called the “Ambrosian” ms.)||Italian|
|§ The Hakluyt editor's Introduction assigns the number 68 to this ms.|
|Pigafetta Printed Editions|
|undated||Jacques Fabre||Le Voyage et Navigation, faict par les Espaignolz …||French|
|1536||unknown||(unknown title; translation of Fabre edition)||Italian|
|1625||Richard Wren||(unknown title)||English|
|1800||Amoretti||Primo viaggio intorno al globo terracqueo …|
dal caualiere Antonio Pigafetta.
|1801||H. J. Jansen||(unknown title; translation of Amoretti edition)||French|
|1906||Arthur H. Clark||Magellan's Voyage Around the World||English & Italian|
|1969||Yale Univ. Press||Magellan's Voyage||English & French|
James Burney printed a segment of Pigafetta's account of the San Julián incident, but does not identify his source, which was the Ambrosian ms. (see above manuscript table). The English translation of that segment (below) in the Clark 1905 edition is identical to Burney's, which suggests the former was copied from the latter.
Those conspirators consisted of the overseer of the fleet, one Johan de Cartagena, the treasurer, Alouise de Mendosa, the accountant, Anthonio Cocha, and Gaspar de Cazada. The overseer of the men having been quartered, the treasurer was killed by dagger blows, for the treason was discovered. Some days after that, Gaspar de Casada, was banished with a priest in that land of Patagonia. The captain-general did not wish to have him killed, because the emperor, Don Carlo, had appointed him captain.
Burney adds a footnote to his version of the above:
What is said by Pigafetta of Gaspard de Casada, should have been related of Juan de Cartagena.
In other words, de Casada was executed, while Cartagena was banished with the priest, as correctly stated in the three French mss. The error rules out the possibility that the Milan ms. is the work of Pigafetta himself, who surely would not have made such a blunder when writing in his own native language. It would therefore seem to have been written by someone who got the facts mixed up. The Hakluyt editor (Stanley of Alderly) makes no mention of this error, although—given his numerous footnotes referring to variations found within the Milan ms.—he was presumably quite familiar with it.
Nor does he reveal which of the three French mss. he used for his translation.
In Popper's lecture at the Argentine Geographical Institute, he spoke of the former existence of the San Sebastián Channel. See In Search of San Sebastián for an excerpt from his presentation.
In Ramusio's three-volume Delle Navigationi et Viaggi, only the recto pages are numbered; in vol. I, pp. 1-394. The modern recto page is therefore twice the printed number minus 1, or minus 2 for the facing verso page.
Publication dates are:
vol. I: 1550
vol. II: 1559
vol. III: 1556
Ramusio's work is often referred to as the “Ramusio Collection” or “Ramusio's collection of voyages” (or similar) and its actual title is not given.
The editor of Monumenta Cartographica (Dr. Frederik Caspar Wieder, Librarian of the University of Leiden) has interpreted a “PERISCH” legend on one of the globe gores as follows:
“If this word is divided into three parts, we get the meaning of it: PER I SCH, the I indicating Joannes, the SCH Schöner, i. e. per I. Schöner— by Johannes Schöner.”
However, the legend is in fact “PERISCII”—a word to describe “Those who live within a polar circle, whose shadows, during some summer days, will move entirely round, falling toward every point of the compass.” (Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary). The word appears directly below the Antarctic circle on the globe gore. In The Mapping of the World, editor R. A. Skelton writes:
“The craftsman-artist could well be from the school of Schöner, … The gores are tentatively dated c. 1535; they could be earlier but are unlikely to be as early as 1523-24 as stated by Wieder.”
The Wonderful Voyage is an English translation by “W. P.” (William Philip) of the original Dutch Journal ofte Beschryvinghe …. The identity of the actual author is unknown, but in referring to the passage named (at Le Maire's suggestion) as the Strait of Le Maire, the author wrote (p. 25) that “ … by good right it should rather have been called William Schouten's Strait.” In a pamphlet accompanying the facsimile edition, A. L. Rousen concludes (p. 20) that the book “… was evidently written by one on the side of Schouten.”
The author states the latitude but makes no attempt to estimate the longitude in many of the ship positions. Accordingly, in preparing the ship route in Google Earth, a straight line was drawn from one known location to the next such location (Tenerife to Cape Verde, for example). Then, the longitude of any point, or points, between these locations (in this example, the Tropic of Cancer) was noted in Google Earth and used to place an icon at that position.
In Titulo XXXI, Seixas describes la Canal de San Sebastian and states (folio 63) that “Desta Canal, aunque la hemos visto, no hemos estado en ella, y hemos sabido comunicando con algunos que la han Navegado en parte, que es fondable para embarcaciones de poco porte.” (“Of this canal, although we have seen it, we have not been in it, and we have reliable communications from others who have navigated it in part that it is fit for anchorage by vessels of small portage.”)
The First Voyage Round the World Introduction states that “This volume contains six contemporary accounts of Magellan's voyage … ” but gives only the vaguest references to his sources. The quotations which follow are taken from Stanley's Introduction. Additional details will be added as soon as possible.
de la Torre's “Derrotero del viage …” comprises Appendix XIV in Navarrete: Coleccion de los Viages y Descubrimientos …, volume 5. A footnote on the first page (p. 241) of the Appendix states:
“In this relation is found a derrotero of the complete voyage from la Coruña to the isles of Maluco, with a very particular description of the Strait of Magellan and of the same the Isles of Maluco, written by the pilot Martin de Uriarte.”
The map by an unknown cartographer is popularly known as the “Turin Map” after its location in the Royal Library of Turin, Italy (Biblioteca Reale di Torino). Among other place names, the map detail view shows:
The expedition to Maluco, 1525-1536, is generally known as the “Loaysa Expedition” after Garcia Jofre de Loaysa, the commander of the expedition. The ships were: Anunciada, Pataje, San Gabriel, San Lesmes, Santa Maria de la Victoria, Santa Maria del Parrel and Santi Spiritus. Martin de Uriarte, the pilot of one of the ships, provided a fairly detailed description of the passage through the Strait of Magellan, as part of Hernando de la Torre's “Derrotero …” (see de la Torre, above). Neither he nor the Hakluyt Society editor name the ship but since he subsequently witnessed the last will of Sebastián del Cano onboard the Victoria, presumably he was pilot of that ship.
van Walbeek's map shows “Windhonds Bay,” named after the Dutch Nassau Fleet ship Windhond [Dutch; Wind hond = greyhound] which visited the area during the first quarter of the 17th century. See “On the Locations ...” for details about Windhonds Bay on the southern coast of Tierra del Fuego.
Note: For reasons unknown, the bay's name is given in English instead of Dutch (“Wind Hond Baai”), and the English “Bay” appears at other locations on the map. Also, “Hoorn” is mis-spelled (“C. de Horen”), and the Spanish “Isla” rather than the Dutch “Eylandt” is abbreviated at “I. de Diego Ramires” [sic, Ramirez].
Waldseemüller's map seems to favor Portugal over Spain. As noted by Peter Dickson (p. 28), “… there is no sign of the demarcation line established by the Treaty of Tordesillas … [and] … the placement of that little Portuguese flag near the southern end of what we know today as Argentina was quite brazen in legal terms.”
Warriner's book is mentioned here because of his passing reference to Nicholas Lawson, as noted in The Seven-Year Search for Nicholas Oliver Lawson by Marcel Nordlohne.
Despite the “Captain” in the title, Wood was Master on the Sweepstakes and John Narbrough was the captain. Later (1676) Wood was made captain of the Speedwell frigate. By the time his “Voyage” was published almost 20 years later he'd held that rank for quite awhile, which may explain its appearance in his title.
Writing in The Threshold of the Unknown Region (London, 1876), author Clements Markham says the following of Wood:
On his return he published ‘Captain Wood's Voyage through the Streights of Magellan,’ in which Narborough's name is not once mentioned, and, for all that appears to the contrary, Wood was commanding the expedition.
It's true that Narbrough's name is not mentioned, but Wood makes some thirty references to “our Captain” (or similar), making it very clear to his readers (with the notable exception of Markham) that he was not the captain.